Natural born liar

Tony Blair admits: I would have invaded Iraq anyway
Tony Blair has said he would have invaded Iraq even without evidence of weapons of mass destruction and would have found a way to justify the war to parliament and the public. He made the confession during an interview with Fern Britton, to be broadcast on Sunday on BBC1, in which he said he would still have thought it right to remove Saddam Hussein from power. "If you had known then that there were no WMDs, would you still have gone on?" Blair was asked. He replied: "I would still have thought it right to remove him [Saddam Hussein]".

Significantly, Blair added: "I mean obviously you would have had to use and deploy different arguments about the nature of the threat." He continued: "I can't really think we'd be better with him and his two sons in charge, but it's incredibly difficult. That's why I sympathise with the people who were against it [the war] for perfectly good reasons and are against it now, but for me, in the end I had to take the decision." He explained it was "the notion of him as a threat to the region" because Saddam Hussein had used chemical weapons against his own people.
Saddam Hussein killing his own people?! Why, how dare he! That's the job of western coalition forces led by the great peacemakers of the world, the USA. And they certainly made a better job of it than Saddam ever did.

Blair is admitting that he was prepared to present any old set of lies to the British people and to parliament to justify invading Iraq, which he wanted to do on the grounds of getting rid of Saddam Hussein, even though that was not a legal justification for war and would have made the British involvement in the invasion a clear-cut  illegal act of aggression against a sovereign state.

Blair could be around for another forty years.Let's hope that at some point he is made to face something a little more substantial than the gentlemen's club masquerading as the Chilcot inquiry. What a shameless, contemptible little shit Blair is.